I have no new images. I've already said that.
I could write about the books I'm finishing up, three of them. That might not be very interesting, except perhaps for the Houellebecq. I've read ll of his books now except the latest one. There really is no need. He's not a great writer in the normal sense - that his books tell unique stories well. In that regard he is rather limited. The settings are always different, but they seem the same. The main character often has a different name, but they are presented to be some form of the writer. That is an assumption, though. I know very little about him as a person. He advances a similar position in most of his books on social and political issues - that liberal ideals are often deeply flawed, to the point of absurdity. Yet every so often he surprises me with some insight dragged up from the chthonic.
That's all I have today, but I've said that, too.
